Who could call Orwell “outdated”?

The particulars of this article are fairly self explanatory. I was listening to The New York Times Book Review podcast while doing the dishes. I was amazed at what I heard. The self-proclaimed Orwell expert suggested that Nineteen Eighty-four and Animal Farm were outdated. The dishes splashed, though I’m not sure if any broke.

The irony of an esteemed outfit like The New York Times Book Review getting Orwell so very wrong just after I’d written a defence of established literary critics (inspired by Dorothy Parker) was not lost in the dirty water. The result is a defence of my beloved Orwell (in the style of Dorothy Parker) called Satirical Doublespeak? published by Trebuchet Magazine.

1984

I love Trebuchet Magazine – only they delight in my absurdist humour; only they rejoice in following the peculiar clues and twisted turns that sometimes come forth from my guts in the form of tofu and pink rubber gloves.

Who else would fall for a pre-review analysis of Total Recall through elementary and culinary themes?

Who else would rejoice in a defence of Orwell in the style of Dorothy Parker that is informed dirty dish water and calls to task a self-proclaimed Orwell expert from The New York Times?

Trebuchet, Trebuchet, Trebuchet. Visionary folk ;)

Read the article:

Read Satirical Doublespeak? as published by Trebuchet Magazine on 18 March 2013

OR

Read a version with all the hyperlinks and references on this site.

Tofu Recall: An Elementary and Culinary Guide to Not Fretting About the Remake

This article first appeared in Trebuchet Magazine on 26 June 2012.

______________________

Like many, when the pre-trailer trailer of the new Total Recall was released I was incensed.

The very idea that something as purely gold as Total Recall could be re-made felt like a travesty. It felt like trying to recreate Tutankhamun’s tomb out of turmeric. Why bother? We, the people, will see it for the fake it is; and, simply, it will suck.

I had no reason to suspect such a sophisticated rebuttal would tumble. At the time the very idea of a remake was like a full-scale Hollywood intrusion into the crevices of my heart. It was an assault on everything I held dear – on experience, on art, on gold, and perhaps most importantly, on memory.

On Memory

Of course, when I had these feelings I didn’t remember that memory is a central theme of the film because all I could recall was cheese. Lots and lots of cheese.

Sure the cheese is overwhelming to the point where it’s difficult to remember much else, but that’s what makes the film gold, right?

Dystopias are serious, they’re about the world falling apart and the struggle to change before we get to the dreadful ‘there.’ It’s in this environment that Arnie comes into his own. He tempers that seriousness a little so it’s digestible to a wider audience. He adds a layer of cheese that is unforced. He’s not a hipster fitting in, he’s a body builder moving around.

Having Arnie in a dystopia is like having something a little tart with something sweet. Like a little green tomato pickle – which is tasty and acidic and spicy, with cheese – which is soft and subtle and comforting. In this scenario the green tomato pickle is the dystopia and Arnie is the cheese.

The next thing I remember about the film is Sharon Stone. She reminds me of what my friend Jules calls a slutty cheese, like a soft brie that oozes and is always falling out of its dress. A slightly more sophisticated cheese perhaps, but cheese nonetheless.

I’ve never had a problem with cheese. In proof of point, a couple of years ago I went to a very bad cabaret variety show with only one performance that I loved – a woman doing the Sharon Stone Basic Instinct drill in the dark with a brightly lit flashing merkin. (Take a moment to visualise that). Yes, some people thought it was tacky – I thought it was gold. Perhaps that’s why I loved Total Recall so much. I don’t have a problem with tacky. In my memories of Total Recall it was the indelicate application of cheese that made the film.

Re-watch

It was in this spirit that I sat down for my first re-watch since learning of the travesty of the remake.

What a film! I thought in wonder, and silently started to count its merits.

The themes are as relevant as ever. The many guises of politics and power struggles. The mass media labelling freedom fighters as “terrorists.” It’s like lighting up a flashing sign that says: This is What Propaganda Looks Like.

Look as it is discussed so seamlessly! I thought with pride.

More than anything else Total Recall launches the idea that Anything We Can Do Technology Can Do Better to its limits – applying it to something as personal, as human, as memories.

Genius.

And, of course, I was also thinking: This movie isn’t cheese with green tomato pickle, this movie is tofu! Serious and healthy and a perfect base for sucking up the specifics. It’s like new age comfort food, like a tofu scramble!

In this scenario the dystopia is the tofu and Arnie the scramble that makes a suspicious product more presentable.

Smothered

Then, inevitably it seems now, the absurdity hit me hard.

Barely ten minutes into the film and there was Arnie, an enormous body builder with muscles that look like they belong on the cover of an Italiano staliano romance, not a construction site, acting (it hurts me to say this) pretty appallingly, and mucking about with a jackhammer – probably on a piece of painted foam.

It sucks. It’s distracting. I want more green tomato chutney with my cheese. Fuck it, I want the tofu scramble back. But it’s gone ….

The tofu is the material, the context, the message. The tofu is the story and it was being smothered with cheese before my eyes. A tofu scramble is one thing – some firm tofu crumbled with onion and garlic and diced vegetables, sautéed with a touch of turmeric for colour, salt and pepper and herbs to taste, perhaps even served with a little grated cheese on top. I’m not opposed. Smothering the tofu in cheese so it becomes a big congealed mess is another thing all together though. I don’t want to suggest that cheese is bad, but who wants their tofu covered in it?

And this is the trouble with Total Recall: it is a brilliant story, but the brilliant story is barely visible through the layers and layers of cheese.

Remembered Wholesale

Which brings us to the short story the film is based on – “We Can Remember it for You Wholesale” by Philip K. Dick.

Philip K. Dick? You will likely ask. Didn’t he also write “Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?”

Well, yes, he did. I would likely answer.

Wasn’t that the story that is otherwise known as …. Here, you would likely draw breath. During the pause I would likely nod, encouraging you to go on. Then you would likely whisper in the revered tones it deserves …

… Blade Runner?

And then, we would likely gently sigh together and sit with that thought for a moment …

… because, of course, Blade Runner is not cheese.

Blade Runner is something hard-core delicate – like ninja knapsack food sustenance.

If Total Recall is tofu scramble smothered in cheese, then Blade Runner is spicy tofu perfectly wrapped in seaweed with a piece of cool cucumber slipped in for efficient hydration. Satisfying, transportable and sophisticated.

By coincidence I re-watched Blade Runner a couple of weeks before re-watching Total RecallBlade Runner outlives its era. It doesn’t feel old or dated. The fashion doesn’t stand out or stand in. The technology is seamless. The mis-en-scene is striking and clean. It doesn’t fade.

Total Recall on the other hand never left its era. It was released in 1990, eight years after Blade Runner, yet it has 1980s written all over it. The technology is clunky. The eighties aerobics outfits are garish. The total lack of ambiance is lazy. It will never transcend.

Why such dramatic differences? The question never occurred to me until my very insightful boyfriend suggested that the budget for Total Recall went on Arnie.

Revelation

And that is how I learnt that Philip K. Dick’s great story got covered in cheese, dressed up with turmeric, and made to look like gold. That is when I understood that Total Recall could be like Blade Runner and that doing it right might just be the motivation for the remake

Perhaps the remake will be smooth.

Perhaps it will be tight.

Perhaps it will be tofu.

 

The Dystopians’ Guide to Positive Thinking

Here’s the article: The Dystopians’ Guide to Positive Thinking was published by For Books Sake on 11 May 2012.

Here’s why I wrote it:

Margaret Atwood’s dystopian classic “The Handmaid’s Tale.”

Misunderstandings in the mainstream media about the popularity of The Hunger Games and a deep sense of responsibility for clarifying the confusion is what got me writing this article.

The Hunger Games and other novels in the Nouveau Dystopian Wave follow in a long tradition of writing that includes Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-four and Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. So, why weren’t they being taken more seriously?

People just couldn’t understand why young women would be reading books that imagined such a dreadful future. In their futile attempts at doing so the young readers of these books were often dismissed or patronised. The question of what draws people to read stories of negative futures is so intriguing to me that I jockied my life around enough to be able to go back to study to try and work it out in 2010. Then in early 2012 when the media around The Hunger Games was getting big I saw  misunderstanding everywhere and I knew I had to do something to set it straight.

One of the reasons for the confusion is the prevalence and popularity of black and white attitude that positive thinking was always best – anything that said differently was odd and confusing. I wanted to use this polarised position on positive thinking as the basis of the article:

“In an era that tends to idealise positive thinking it is easy to assume it is ‘good’ and other ways of thinking are ‘bad.’”

I loved the idea of flipping the norm and handing out some advice to positive thinkers from the dystopian vaults – switching the advice flow for a while. I wanted to evoke the idea of Dystopians as a grouping of people – I identify as a dystopian; I think others do too; and, I think it connects us in meaningful ways. More than anything though I wanted to locate this new era of dystopian literature within the genre and give show it was as serious and meaningful as its predecessors like Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-four and Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale.

The response to The Dystopians’ Guide to Positive Thinking was really amazing.

Lots of people shared the article and commented on it around the interwebs. Margaret Atwood even retweeted it (fangirl flutter):

And, it was the most read article on For Books’ Sake for quite some time:

I can’t thank For Books’ Sake enough for getting such a long and in-depth article out there. Lots of people don’t have the guts, but this proves that it pays off.

Read the article:

Read The Dystopians’ Guide to Positive Thinking as published by For Books Sake on 11 May 2012.